Post by messi05 on Jan 22, 2024 8:09:01 GMT 3
Deputies. On another front, the limitation of the Federal Supreme Court's power to hear habeas corpus actions is discussed, through a new interpretation of the Constitution. The innovation would be to limit defense requests to just two instances. Thus, against first instance decisions, habeas corpus would be available to the Court of Justice and an ordinary appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. The Supreme Court could not be activated. I argue that the action of habeas corpus cannot be limited. Brazil has the third largest prison population in the world, with 726 thousand people in prison — almost double the number of vacancies.
Around 40% of those incarcerated were not Buy Phone Number List finally judged. We will not solve impunity or judicial slowness by bringing forward sentences, often unfairly, but will only create new problems. Prisons serve as organized crime agencies, real logistics and human resources offices for organizations. In this context, defending habeas corpus is defending individual freedom, defending the expectation of civility for each and every one, but it is also defending society against the unbridled spread of crime. Violence and corruption cannot be fought outside the law. The prosecution of criminals without the rule of law only generates new crimes.
The imposition of the procedure is not compatible with the essence of self-composition (even if assisted), where interested parties need to actively participate in formulating the decision. Likewise, in the procedural sphere, the interest in acting cannot be conditioned on the use of a certain extrajudicial method. The interest in acting arises from the resisted claim, and in the case of consumer conflicts, except for the rare cases of bad faith, every legal action is certainly preceded by a frustrated direct negotiation, which is more than enough to legitimize the demand.
Around 40% of those incarcerated were not Buy Phone Number List finally judged. We will not solve impunity or judicial slowness by bringing forward sentences, often unfairly, but will only create new problems. Prisons serve as organized crime agencies, real logistics and human resources offices for organizations. In this context, defending habeas corpus is defending individual freedom, defending the expectation of civility for each and every one, but it is also defending society against the unbridled spread of crime. Violence and corruption cannot be fought outside the law. The prosecution of criminals without the rule of law only generates new crimes.
The imposition of the procedure is not compatible with the essence of self-composition (even if assisted), where interested parties need to actively participate in formulating the decision. Likewise, in the procedural sphere, the interest in acting cannot be conditioned on the use of a certain extrajudicial method. The interest in acting arises from the resisted claim, and in the case of consumer conflicts, except for the rare cases of bad faith, every legal action is certainly preceded by a frustrated direct negotiation, which is more than enough to legitimize the demand.